Adversarial Stability

EASA proves the system behaves predictably under hostile, degraded, and misconfigured enterprise conditions. Simulation-only — no production data is mutated, no governance execution occurs.

Simulation domains

  • Infrastructure failure. GSCL unreachable, FIL conflict, DIL warning, SSIAL latency / critical stress.
  • Permission & security. Unauthorised admin attempts, role escalation — enforced at the route gate as 401/403.
  • System consistency. FIL vs DIL, SSIAL vs PCSV, EXDL vs GOC, ETRHL compromised.

Failure categories

All failures resolve to one of four explainable categories: DEGRADED, PARTIALLY_INCONSISTENT, BLOCKED_DEPLOYMENT, OBSERVABILITY_GAP. No state is ever "unknown", "crashed", "undefined", or "irrecoverable".

Stability category

Categorical only — HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW. There is no numeric score.

Live report

The live adversarial stability snapshot is rendered on the Documentation Hub for authenticated administrators, and is also available as a read-only API at /api/v1/easa/report.

Canonical source: docs/easa/stability-audit.md.

You are here · Trust & Safety · step 8
← Enterprise Readiness
Security Modelstart here

Start of Trust & Safety: Security Model.

No direct successor — surfacing the section entry point.

What should I do next?

Assurance Layerprimary

continues in "trust-safety"

CISO Procurement Justification
continues in "trust-safety"
Enterprise Readiness
continues in "trust-safety"

Ranked using IA v1 graph + intent map + glossary density (deterministic; no AI inference).

Enterprise ReadinessAudit Readiness